🔗 Share this article

Tomas Anez Dos Santos toiled in a tiny glade deep in the of Peru Amazon when he heard movements approaching through the lush jungle.

He realized that he stood surrounded, and stood still.

“A single individual stood, directing using an arrow,” he remembers. “Unexpectedly he became aware I was here and I started to flee.”

He found himself face to face the Mashco Piro. For a long time, Tomas—residing in the modest settlement of Nueva Oceania—had been almost a local to these itinerant individuals, who avoid contact with strangers.

A new document issued by a advocacy organization indicates there are a minimum of 196 described as “isolated tribes” in existence globally. This tribe is thought to be the largest. It says a significant portion of these communities may be decimated over the coming ten years should administrations neglect to implement more actions to defend them.

The report asserts the most significant risks come from logging, extraction or exploration for crude. Isolated tribes are exceptionally at risk to basic disease—as such, it states a danger is caused by interaction with proselytizers and social media influencers looking for clicks.

Lately, members of the tribe have been coming to Nueva Oceania with greater frequency, according to inhabitants.

Nueva Oceania is a angling community of a handful of families, located high on the shores of the Tauhamanu waterway in the center of the of Peru Amazon, a ten-hour journey from the closest village by watercraft.

This region is not designated as a preserved area for isolated tribes, and logging companies function here.

Tomas reports that, on occasion, the noise of industrial tools can be detected continuously, and the Mashco Piro people are observing their forest disturbed and ruined.

Among the locals, residents say they are divided. They are afraid of the projectiles but they also possess profound regard for their “relatives” who live in the jungle and desire to safeguard them.

“Permit them to live in their own way, we are unable to change their way of life. That's why we preserve our space,” states Tomas.

Residents in Nueva Oceania are concerned about the damage to the community's way of life, the risk of aggression and the possibility that loggers might subject the Mashco Piro to illnesses they have no immunity to.

While we were in the community, the group made themselves known again. A young mother, a resident with a two-year-old girl, was in the forest collecting fruit when she detected them.

“We heard shouting, sounds from individuals, a large number of them. As though there were a large gathering shouting,” she shared with us.

It was the first time she had met the tribe and she escaped. An hour later, her head was still throbbing from terror.

“As there are timber workers and companies destroying the woodland they are fleeing, possibly because of dread and they arrive in proximity to us,” she stated. “We are uncertain how they might react towards us. That's what scares me.”

In 2022, a pair of timber workers were confronted by the group while catching fish. One was hit by an arrow to the abdomen. He lived, but the other man was found deceased after several days with multiple puncture marks in his physique.

Authorities in Peru has a approach of no engagement with remote tribes, rendering it forbidden to commence contact with them.

This approach began in a nearby nation following many years of campaigning by tribal advocacy organizations, who saw that initial contact with remote tribes lead to whole populations being eliminated by illness, poverty and malnutrition.

In the 1980s, when the Nahau tribe in the country came into contact with the world outside, 50% of their community died within a few years. During the 1990s, the Muruhanua tribe suffered the identical outcome.

“Remote tribes are highly at risk—from a disease perspective, any exposure could spread sicknesses, and even the simplest ones might eliminate them,” explains a representative from a Peruvian indigenous rights group. “Culturally too, any contact or disruption may be highly damaging to their way of life and well-being as a society.”

For the neighbours of {